I took a lesson today, the first one I've had for around nine or ten months. Mostly, we talked about where I should be going next, which inevitably lead to the not-to-be-avoided issues of voice-leading and (of course) melodicism.
First, I was made to to feel sick by how well the guy plays, and then was given a couple of good exercises intended to teach harmonic fluidity by emphasising the golden rules of minimal movement and maximal common tones. For example: take any iii, vi dom, V, I progression such as Em7-A7b9-Dm7-Cmaj7. Using the same basic inversion (string set) for the E-7, D-7, and Cmaj7 chords, build a smooth, linear connection between all the chords by finding fingerings for the A7b9 and G7b9 that are on the same string set, and as close as possible to the others. This'll help explain what I mean:
You can see that the minor chords and the Cmaj7th chord are the same inversion, it's just that the minors have their 3rd and 7ths flatted, obviously. The 7b9 chords are derived from a different inversion, although one that is also on the top four strings, and which fits in there perfectly to build a nice line that smoothly descends. Naturally, as there are a gazillion inversions in different sets all over the fretboard, this exercise contains several years of work alone. Probably best to start with three different sets of inversions and see how it goes from there. Put some single-note fills in too.
Which leads me to the next exercise, an idea for melodically ornamenting chord progressions and coming up with rubato introductions, although I admit to not really understanding how to make anything of this quite yet. The idea is to think only of the two-note "core" of the chords (as in all the recent two-note comping I've been doing.) Taking the same progression (Em7-A7b9-Dm7-Cmaj7), think only of the 3rd and 7th at the heart of each chord. Now, given that the core gives the chord its identity, and therefore never changes, ornament the centre by making single-note lines from all the possible alterations and extensions that might be part of a fuller chord.
But there's more: because the dominant chords contain a tritone and are therefore candidates for tritone (or flat-five) substitution, the 3rd and the 7th of the dominant chords can be thought of as either the 7th and 3rd of the original chord, or as the 3rd and 7th of the new substitution. This means that there's not one, but two, basic chords to make melody lines from, including all their various alterations and extensions. For example, I could think of the notes G and C# as either the 7th and 3rd of A7, or as the 3rd and 7th of Eb7, and make lines from either chord so as to describe (for the sake of argument) A7b9, A7b9#5, A13, or A7#11, or Eb79, Eb7#9, Eb7#11, etc. As long as the core retains its identity, and the movement from one core to the next is cleary marked in the progression , then it's always going to sound ok. I should probably get a sound file to describe this better.
Finally, we discussed playing melodically, and, as usual, it was a case of "use the force." However, having diagnosed my playing and pronounced it less knackers that I find it to be myself, he suggested resisting the urge to run up and down the scales by using more string skipping, and most of all, generally playing much less (although now I think about it, the advice "you should play much less" might not be quite the encouragement I was looking for.) It's advice he's received himself, as he's currently taking lessons with Lorne Lofsky who's constantly advising him to use more space. I love Canadians -- their vast nation has gifted them a characterological predisposition to think always "emptiness."
On a side-note, he casually claimed that there are only three guitarists worth listening to in terms of innovation and technique: Howard Roberts, Joe Pass, and Wes Montgomery. All the others, so the argument went, were basically versions of these great men. Interesting, but a throw-away comment in the course of a friendly chat, so please, no death threats from hardcore Larry Coryell fanatics willing to spill blood to defend his honour. George Van Eps fans, however, can kiss my honky British a**...
(Ahem). Lots to think about, there, then, and no doubt I won't have hardly touched it by the time I see him again next week. Cheers.








